| Message |
I have a race setup, not PnP. I calibrated the inputs to read OEM sensors and run 5 bar AEM MAP sensor. MAP is more accurate than MAF because MAP measure pressure at the intake ports. Engine Flow=(engine displacement)x(volumetric efficiency)x(engine speed)x(manifold pressure). That's how the ECU calculates engine flow demand. So it can't be any more accurate. However with the MAP you need to set up all the correction maps to have it run smooth like a stock setup. So it requires a lot more tuning than the 'idiot-proof' MAF setup. BTW, Haltech has 2 step and flat shift features. But no traction control. And nothing beats properly dyno-tuned maps. Not auto-tune, not quick-tune. That's why auto-tune has limited adjustment. You don't want to depend on auto-tune which relies on the WBO2. When your WBO2 acts up, the AFR goes out of whack, then kaboom there goes your engine. I haven't used AEM, but I don't think you can go wrong with either.
www.ztechz.net ICQ # 14337317
 
|
 |